Why the Federalists thought a larger Union would be better for democracy.
Date Submitted: 01/14/2003 10:53:45
Category: / Law & Government / Government & Politics
Length: 6 pages (1553 words)
Category: / Law & Government / Government & Politics
Length: 6 pages (1553 words)
According to Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, authors of the Federalist Papers, the union of the States would be better as a large republic, firmly connected by a more powerful, centralized government than that which existed under the Articles of Confederation. The necessity of such a government lies in the need for the fledgling country to control both internal and external disputes, arising from internal factions, or from foreign threats. In their opinion, an extended …
Is this Essay helpful? Join now to read this particular paper
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
…arising within groups seeking to perform a dishonorable act. A larger Union is also more able to control external forces, and to usurp internal insurrection through collective security. It would be harder in a smaller republic, according to them, to protect the principles upon which this country was established, and the liberty of her citizens.
Bibliography
Ketchum, Robert, ed. The Anti-Federalist Papers: New York: Mass Market, 1996.
Rossiter, Clinton. The Federalist Papers. New York: Penguin Putnam,
1961.
Need a custom written paper? Let our professional writers save your time.