Why Doesn't Class Conflict Dominate Politics in Advanced Industrial Societies?
Date Submitted: 09/10/2006 03:36:52
Category: / History / European History
Length: 7 pages (1861 words)
Category: / History / European History
Length: 7 pages (1861 words)
In his work, "The Distribution of Power Within the Political Community: Class, Status, Party", Max Weber gives a very detailed description of how society works within its classes, status groups and parties. All communities are arranged in a way where goods from different type, tangible and intangible, symbolic and material are distributed. Thus, such distribution is always unequal and necessarily involves power. As Weber explains, " 'classes', 'status groups', and 'parties' are phenomena of the distribution
Is this Essay helpful? Join now to read this particular paper
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
explains, " 'classes', 'status groups', and 'parties' are phenomena of the distribution of power within a community" (Webber, 207). Given this information we can easily provide an answer to the question why class conflict does not have a dominant function in the politics of advanced industrial societies. The distribution of power depicts a stable backbone for the support and provision of the classes, thus they seize to create conflicts, but establish social mobility among the classes instead.
Need a custom written paper? Let our professional writers save your time.