Wicksell on Classical theories
James Ahiakpor in his essay, “WICKSELL ON THE CLASSICAL THEORIES OF MONEY, CREDIT, INTEREST AND THE PRICE LEVEL: PROGRESS OR RETROGRESSION?” started up the argument which was followed by the number of replies. His treatment of Wicksell place in the history of monetary economics is kind of biased, as we shall see further. As he states in the Abstract to his essay:
Knut Wicksell occupies a significant place in the history of monetary economics as
Is this Essay helpful? Join now to read this particular paper
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
CREDIT, INTEREST AND PRICE LEVEL: A COMMENT ON AHIAKPOR,” American Journal of Economics & Sociology 58 (Jul 1999)
Ekelund, Robert B. Jr., Hébert, Robert F., “A History of Economic Theory and Method,” 4th ed, (The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1997)
Gootzeit, Michael J., “WICKSELL VS THE CLASSICS ON THE MECHANICS OF THE QUANTITY THEORY: A COMMENT ON AHIAKPOR,” American Journal of Economics & Sociology 58 (Jul 1999)
Humphrey, Thomas M., “EXONERATING WICKSELL: A COMMENT ON AHIAKPOR,” American Journal of Economics & Sociology 58 (Jul 1999)
Need a custom written paper? Let our professional writers save your time.