Why Presidentialism is Undesirable in a Newly Founded Democracy: Brazil's Struggle to Liberalize
Brazil's transformation from an authoritarian regime to a presidential democracy was a slow and
faltered attempt. From the early suggestions of democratic development, there were both
administrations that contributed to democratic growth, as well as administrations that opposed this
liberalization. This led to an instability in the Brazilian form of democratic government, their
economy, and their political parties. The people's reactions to these instabilities confirm the fact that
the Brazilian democratic regime was not working
Is this Essay helpful? Join now to read this particular paper
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
id not represent a true continual dual legitimacy between the executive and
legislature. Perhaps most importantly was the fact that the people did not actually choose the
president. Since the government's main concern seemed to be retaining their party1s power, they
kept the people from making a real difference in choosing the president. These circumstances
collectively confirm the fact that the Brazilian government was far from a true democratic
presidential regime.
Need a custom written paper? Let our professional writers save your time.