What are the relative merits and drawbacks of parliamentary and presidential systems? Why have most East European countries adopted parliamentary systems?
Date Submitted: 08/13/2004 16:54:35
Category: / Social Sciences / Political Science
Length: 10 pages (2716 words)
Category: / Social Sciences / Political Science
Length: 10 pages (2716 words)
There has been much argument amongst political academics concerning the virtues and failures of both parliamentary and presidential systems. While all systems of governance vary from country to country, parliamentary systems can broadly be defined as where the executive, in the form of a prime minister and his cabinet are drawn from the elected legislature (parliament). In presidential systems however the executive (president) is elected separately from the legislature and members of the executive cabinet
Is this Essay helpful? Join now to read this particular paper
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
Outcomes. 2nd edition. Macmillan Press Ltd. 1997
Sedelius, Thomas. Semi Presidentialism in Post- Communist Countries: An Outline for Dissertation Project on Executive-Legislative Relations in Transitional Semi-presidential Countries. Work in Progress. Örebro University.
Seldon, A. ed. The Blair Effect. Little, Brown and Company. 2001.
Shugart, M & Carey, J. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1992
Taras, Raymond. 'Separating Power: Keeping Presidents in Check' in Ray Taras ed.,
Post-communist Presidents. Cambridge University Press. 1996.
Need a custom written paper? Let our professional writers save your time.