Cherokee Removal These articles, “A Permanent Habitat for the American Indians” and “Memorial of the Cherokee Nation,” enlighten the reader to both sides of a very controversial issue in the early 1830’s. The views of Andrew Jackson on removing the Cherokee Indians are very biased and very inconsiderate. As a unified nation, the Cherokees very clearly state their position and authenticate their claim to their native lands. Both articles, when combined, provide a very broad …showed first 75 words of 628 total…

…showed last 75 words of 628 total…statement is simply all the “wonderful” benefits the government will provide for the Indians just so the people will think that he is right. The Cherokee memorial has a more realistic argument without all of the garbage. Last, Jackson has the audacity to add insult to injury and degrade the Indians. A civilization with strong, ingrained roots and an established culture, and Jackson not only steals their land, but kicks them while they are down?